Bibliographic record
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to explore the depth psychological mechanism of the acousma projection, theassociation between the psychological gravitation and the projection object by the methods of mental analysisand analysis psychology, i.e. the method of unconsciousness analysis, the method of antitype analysis, and themethod of mental drive. The research result indicates that the “psychological gravitation” attracts theconsciousness to descend as unconsciousness, and the oppression produces large numerous of energy, and therelease of energy compels the consciousness to ascend round and be transformed as the dissident consciousnessin the consciousness layer, i.e. be transformed as the dissident attacking strength, and the projection andabsorption of the unconsciousness thinking activated by the attacking strength in the mirror image produce theacousma which is the objectification of the psychological gravitation and unconsciousness, and agglomeratespart of self-consciousness in the objectification identified by others, and descend and eliminate consciousness, i.e.the psychological energy of attacking agglomerate part of self-consciousness, and the energy and mirror imagepuzzle the self-consciousness. The projection makes the dissident mirror image to be dissident, hostile andenslaved object, and essentially, that is the atman is attracted, controlled and devoured by the psychologicalgravitation. By understanding thoroughly this psychological course of unconsciousness, the energy flows toconsciousness, which can enhance the energy, release the blocked energy, even weaken and eliminate theacousma, i.e. weaken and eliminate the objectification of the acousma projection.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".