MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2107507887 · doi:10.1017/cem.2014.40

Does location matter? A proposed methodology to evaluate neighbourhood effects on cardiac arrest survival and bystander CPR

2015· article· en· W2107507887 on OpenAlexafffund
Jason E. Buick, Katherine S. Allan, Joel G. Ray, Alexander Kiss, Paul Dorian, Peter Gozdyra, Laurie J. Morrison

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Emergency Medicine · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchInstitute of Circulatory and Respiratory HealthUniversity of California, San DiegoNational Institutes of HealthOttawa Hospital Research InstituteUniversity of PittsburghUniversity of WashingtonNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteHeart and Stroke Foundation of CanadaNational Institute of Neurological Disorders and StrokeAmerican Heart Association
KeywordsMedicineNeighbourhood (mathematics)Cardiopulmonary resuscitationReturn of spontaneous circulationObservational studyEmergency medical servicesEmergency medicineLogistic regressionSudden cardiac arrestPopulationMedical emergencyResuscitationInternal medicineEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.015
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.026

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.015
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.099
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Emergency Medicine→Same topicCardiac Arrest and Resuscitation→French-language works237,207→