MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107515483 · doi:10.1109/apec.1992.228329

Analysis and design of a series connected PWM voltage regulator for single phase AC sources

2003· article· en· W2107515483 on OpenAlexaff
Alexandre Campos, G. Joós, P.D. Ziogas, J.F. Lindsay

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Quality and Harmonics
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPulse-width modulationVoltageVoltage sourceTransformerVoltage regulatorVoltage regulationControl theory (sociology)Voltage dividerComputer sciencePower factorAC powerSeries and parallel circuitsDropout voltageElectronic engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors propose a method to regulate a single-phase AC source by using a series-connected auxiliary voltage source. A voltage source inverter, connected in series with the AC supply through a transformer, is used to compensate the input voltage variations in order to achieve a regulated load voltage. Input power factor improvement can also be obtained, when operating with reactive load, by phase-shifting the compensating voltage with respect to the input voltage. The total kVA rating for the system is a fraction of the load total power, and is determined by the maximum allowable line voltage variation. The use of a series connection together with a high-performance modulation technique results in a fast dynamic response and a small-size filter. A high-quality output is readily achieved. The authors describe the proposed method, implementation principles, design equations, and a design example. Simulated and experimental results confirm the concept and feasibility of the proposed system.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.610
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPower Quality and HarmonicsFrench-language works237,207