Structure of the O-antigen polysaccharide present in the lipopolysaccharide of<i>Cronobacter dublinensis</i>(subspecies<i>lactaridi</i>or<i>lausannensis</i>) HPB 3169
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cronobacter dublinensis (formerly Enterobacter sakazakii) HPB 3169 is a pathogenic Gram-negative bacterium that produces a smooth-type lipopolysaccharide in which the antigenic O-polysaccharide component was determined to be a repeating pentasaccharide unit composed of L-rhamnose; 2-acetamido-2-deoxy-D-glucose; 3,6-dideoxy-3-(R)-3-hydroxybutyramido-D-glucose; and 3-deoxy-manno-oct-2-ulosonic acid in the respective molar ratio 2:1:1:1. Chemical and 2D NMR analyses of the O-polysaccharide and a pentasaccharide derived by the mild acid hydrolysis of the ketosyl linkage of the Kdo (3-deoxy-D-manno-2-octulosonic acid) residue in the O-polysaccharide established that the O-antigen is a high molecular mass unbranched polymer of a repeating pentasaccharide unit and has the structure [see formula in text] where Bu is a (R)-3-hydroxybutanoyl substituent. The O-antigen is structurally similar to that of the recently reported Cronobacter sakazakii strain G706 (designated as serotype O5), except that in strain G706 the d-Qui3N is in its N-acetyl form, in contrast to its presence as a 3-deoxy-3-(R)-3-hydroxybutyramido derivative in the C. sakazakii HPB 3169 strain O-antigen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".