A Paradigm Shift in the Evaluation of Information Technology in Health Care
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper examines the notion of productivity, which underlies the reorganization of Quebec's health care system around an information technology-driven virage ambulatoire, or shift to ambulatory (outpatient) care. The reorganization may be traced to a policy decision to address the health care's productivity crisis, a crisis diagnosed in the 1970s based on macroeconomic expenditure trend lines highlighting the "obstacle" to economic growth and to balanced budgets. The information technology-driven virage ambulatoire is aimed at a structural reorganization, based on the principle of: boosting productivity in a service- or information-based economy. The State, thus, relied on analytic categories developed for a particular mode of economic analysis to lead a hospital restructuring program oriented around information technology-based ambulatory care. The result was a refocus from clinical and therapeutic efficiency to administrative imperatives of time, cost, and optimization. Hence, Québec moved to neoliberal productivist system in which clinical and therapeutic effectiveness are subordinated to economic imperatives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.051 | 0.037 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.049 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.029 | 0.017 |
| Open science | 0.003 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.006 | 0.006 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".