Human organ and tissue induced currents by 60 Hz electric and magnetic fields
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The objective of the research presented was to reliably compute induced electric fields and currents in a realistic human model with a high resolution for exposures to 60 Hz electric and magnetic fields. All computations were for an anatomically-derived human full-body model discretized into a set of 3.6 mm cubes. For electric field induction a hybrid method was used. In this method a new quasi-static FDTD formulation was used to compute the fields with the lower resolution of 7.2 mm. The electric field at the body surface was then used to compute the surface charge density. The charge densities from the FDTD were interpolated onto a 3.6 mm grid and used as the source of the body interior potentials and electric fields in the scalar potential finite difference method (SPFD). For magnetic induction the SPFD method was used with the magnetic vector potential as the source. Organ average, organ maximum and spatial maps of the induced electric and current density fields were obtained. These dosimetric data for 30 different organs and tissues can be analyzed from various perspectives.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".