MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107667124 · doi:10.1109/imtc.1999.776127

Test set embedding based on width compression for mixed-mode BIST

2003· article· en· W2107667124 on OpenAlexaff
Krishnendu Chakrabarty, S.R. Das

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicVLSI and Analog Circuit Testing
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBuilt-in self-testBenchmark (surveying)Test compressionAutomatic test pattern generationComputer scienceTest setEmbeddingSet (abstract data type)AlgorithmGenerator (circuit theory)Electronic circuitScheme (mathematics)Design for testingEmbedded systemMathematicsEngineeringPower (physics)Artificial intelligenceReliability engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present a new test generator circuit (TGC) for mixed-mode built-in self-test (BIST) that embeds a precomputed deterministic test set T/sub D/ in a longer sequence. The design method employs width compression based on the property of d-compatibles. To demonstrate the feasibility of the TGC design method, we present experimental data for single stuck-at test sets for the ISCAS 85 circuits and full-scan versions of the ISCAS 89 benchmark circuits. We also achieve significant improvement over another recently-proposed mixed-mode TGC design scheme for BIST.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.942
Threshold uncertainty score0.428

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicVLSI and Analog Circuit TestingFrench-language works237,207