MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107672511 · doi:10.1002/rnc.1289

A UD factorization‐based nonlinear adaptive set‐membership filter for ellipsoidal estimation

2007· article· en· W2107672511 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Robust and Nonlinear Control · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRobustness (evolution)ComputationEllipsoidKernel adaptive filterNonlinear systemFilter (signal processing)Adaptive filterControl theory (sociology)FactorizationComputer scienceMathematicsMathematical optimizationAlgorithmFilter designArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The extended set‐membership filter (ESMF) for nonlinear ellipsoidal estimation suffers from numerical instability, computation complexity as well as the difficulty in filter parameter selection. In this paper, a UD factorization‐based adaptive set‐membership filter is developed and applied to nonlinear joint estimation of both time‐varying states and parameters. As a result of using the proposed UD factorization, combined with a new sequential and selective measurement update strategy, the numerical stability and real‐time applicability of conventional ESMF are substantially improved. Furthermore, an adaptive selection scheme of the filter parameters is derived to reduce the computation complexity and achieve sub‐optimal estimation. Simulation results have shown the efficiency and robustness of the proposed method. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.918
Threshold uncertainty score0.510

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.255
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it