MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107688116 · doi:10.1109/crv.2005.70

Scene Reconstruction with Sparse Range Information

2005· article· en· W2107688116 on OpenAlex
Guangyi Chen, Gregory Dudek, L. Abril Torres-Méndez

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRobotics and Sensor-Based Localization
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBilinear interpolationRange (aeronautics)Interpolation (computer graphics)Computer scienceArtificial intelligenceComputer visionMissing dataPixelImage (mathematics)Iterative reconstructionEnhanced Data Rates for GSM EvolutionPattern recognition (psychology)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper addresses an approach to scene reconstruction by inferring missing range data in a partial range map based on intensity image and sparse initial range data. It is assumed that the initial known range data is given on a number of scan lines one pixel width. This assumption is natural for a range sensor to acquire range data in a 3D real world environment. Both edge information of the intensity image and linear interpolation of the range data are used. Experiments show that this method gives very good results in inferring missing range data. It outperforms both the previous method and bilinear interpolation when a very small percentage of range data is known.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.813
Threshold uncertainty score0.172

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.158
Teacher spread0.153 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotics and Sensor-Based LocalizationFrench-language works237,207