MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2107732021 · doi:10.4212/cjhp.v63i4.934

Stability of Trisodium Citrate and Gentamicin Solution for Catheter Locks after Storage in Plastic Syringes at Room Temperature

2010· article· en· W2107732021 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Dennis Cote, Charmaine E. Lok, Marisa Battistella, Lavern M. Vercaigne

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis
Canadian institutionsToronto General HospitalUniversity Health NetworkUniversity of TorontoUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTrisodium citrateGentamicinSodium citrateCatheterMedicineHemodialysisChromatographySurgeryChemistryAnesthesiaAntibioticsNuclear chemistryBiochemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Catheter-related infections are a major problem for hemodialysis patients with central venous catheters for vascular access. Catheter lock solutions containing an anticoagulant are used to maintain the patency of the catheter between hemodialysis sessions. There is evidence that the use of lock solutions containing an antibiotic is associated with lower rates of infection but also that these solutions can kill microbes in colonized catheters and thus avoid the risks and costs associated with replacing the catheter.Objective: This stability study was conducted to determine whether an extemporaneously prepared gentamicin-citrate catheter lock solution would retain its potency over time, thus allowing for advance preparation of the solution.Methods: Catheter lock solutions containing gentamicin alone, citrate alone, and the combination of gentamicin and citrate were prepared aseptically and packaged in polyethylene syringes. The syringes were stored at room temperature. At timed intervals over 112 days, samples were withdrawn for analysis by means of validated high performance liquid chromatography.Results: None of the 3 lock solutions showed any evidence of degradation during the 112-day observation period. In the formulation containing both gentamicin 2.5 mg/mL and sodium citrate 40 mg/mL (4%), there was no change in the concentration of either gentamicin (p = 0.34) or citrate (p = 0.55). Linear regression analysis of the concentration- time data for the combined formulation showed that 99.97% of the labelled amount of gentamicin and 101.30% of the labelled amount of citrate remained at day 112. The lower limit of the 95% confidence intervals indicated that more than 98.17% of the gentamicin and more than 99.57% of the citrate remained on day 112.Conclusion: The results of this study will allow pharmacies to extemporaneously compound the combined gentamicin-citrate catheter lock solution in advance of use. The method described here will yield a stable product for use in clinical applications.RÉSUMÉContexte : Les infections liées aux cathéters sont un problème important chez les patients hémodialysés dont l'abord vasculaire est réalisé à l'aide de cathéters veineux centraux. On a recours à des solutions pour verrou de cathéter contenant un anticoagulant afin de maintenir la perméabilité du cathéter entre les séances d'hémodialyse. Des données montrent que des solutions pour verrou renfermant un antibiotique sont associées à des taux d'infections inférieurs et que ces solutions peuvent tuer les microbes colonisant les cathéters, ce qui permet donc d'éviter les risques et les coûts associés au remplacement des cathéters.Objectif : Cette étude de stabilité a été menée pour déterminer si une solution extemporanée de gentamicine et de citrate pour verrou de cathéter pouvait conserver sa puissance dans le temps, ce qui permettrait ainsi de préparer la solution à l'avance.Méthodes : Des solutions pour verrou de cathéter contenant de la gentamicine seule, du citrate seul et l'association gentamicine-citrate ont été préparées selon une méthode aseptique, puis conditionnées dans des seringues de polyéthylène. Les seringues ont été conservées à la température ambiante. À différents points dans le temps sur une période de 112 jours, des échantillons ont été prélevés à des fins d'analyse à l'aide d'une épreuve validée par chromatographie liquide haute performance.Résultats : Aucune des trois solutions pour verrou n'a montré de signes de dégradation durant les 112 jours de la période d'observation. La préparation contenant la gentamicine à 2,5 mg/mL et le citrate de sodium à 40 mg/mL (4 %) n'a montré aucun changement dans la concentration de gentamicine (p = 0,34) et de citrate (p = 0,55). Une analyse de régression linéaire des concentrations en fonction du temps de la préparation associant la gentamicine et le citrate a révélé que cette préparation avait retenu 99,97 % de sa concentration initiale de gentamicine et 101,30 % de sa concentration initiale de citrate au jour 112. La limite inférieure de l'intervalle de confiance à 95% a également révélé que la préparation avait retenu plus de 98,17 % de la gentamicine et plus de 99,57 % du citrate au jour 112.Conclusion : Les résultats de cette étude permettront aux pharmacies de préparer à l'avance la solution extemporanée pour verrou de catheter renfermant l'association gentamicine-citrate. La méthode décrite ici donnera un produit stable pour une utilisation dans des applications cliniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.284 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Hospital Pharmacy→Same topicCentral Venous Catheters and Hemodialysis→French-language works237,207→