MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107732614 · doi:10.1109/ccece.2011.6030644

Global PV incentive policies and recommendations for utilities

2011· article· en· W2107732614 on OpenAlexaff
Rajiv K. Varma, Graham Sanderson, Ken Walsh

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicEnergy and Environment Impacts
Canadian institutionsLondon HydroWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncentiveSubsidyPhotovoltaic systemGovernment (linguistics)Context (archaeology)BusinessPresentation (obstetrics)Renewable energyImplementationEnvironmental economicsGlobeIncentive programIndustrial organizationEconomicsComputer scienceEngineeringMarket economyElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The photovoltaic (PV) energy industry has been making significant strides in its development over the past couple of decades. This paper makes a brief presentation of the government incentive policies of countries around the globe who are leading in Photovoltaic (PV) development. Feed-In Tariffs and government subsidies are discussed in the context of their specific implementations as well as some strengths and weakness of each country's PV programs. Aside from government incentives policies, which cannot be controlled by local distribution companies, some recommendations are made for utilities to help overcome the non-technical and technical challenges and help increase interest in PV development in their jurisdictions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.086

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.007
Open science0.0030.003
Research integrity0.0120.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0260.005

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.258
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicEnergy and Environment ImpactsFrench-language works237,207