Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le terme d’incidence chez Guillaume recouvre un rapport de dépendance : l’adjectif est un apport qui trouve un support dans le substantif; l’adjectif est ainsi incident au substantif, un rapport d’incidence externe. Mais Guillaume a proposé que le substantif, lui aussi, a un apport, qui est incident à un support interne. De cette façon, il a réusi à distinguer adjectif et substantif, problème que Jespersen n’a pas su résoudre. Dans cet article on a essayé de préciser la nature de l’incidence interne du substantif, et de démontrer que ce rapport interne, distinctif pour le substantif, est en même temps la base non seulement des contrastes (1) singulier/pluriel, et (2) défini/indéfini, mais aussi du contraste de signification entre adjectif préposé et adjectif postposé dans les langues romanes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it