Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’article cherche à montrer que le bien mourir est une préoccupation qui habite l’humanité depuis les débuts de l’histoire mais que les formes qu’il prend varie selon les périodes et les visions anthropologiques. C’est dans ce contexte général qu’il faut interpréter les conceptions religieuses du bien mourir. La première partie du texte met l’accent sur la diversité des conceptions du bien mourir au cours de l’histoire récente, particulièrement au Québec. La deuxième partie présente le bien mourir dans une perspective religieuse faisant voir, d’une part, le fond commun de la vision de la bonne mort et, d’autre part, les conceptions spécifiques du christianisme, du judaïsme, de l’islam et du bouddhisme à ce propos. Dans la dernière partie, l’auteur discute de la contribution que peuvent apporter ces traditions dans la recherche contemporaine du bien mourir.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".