MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107774304 · doi:10.3280/gdl2011-131001

Il diritto di sciopero nel dialogo fra corti. Casi nazionali a confronto dopo Laval

2011· article· it· W2107774304 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Silvana Sciarra

Bibliographic record

VenueGIORNALE DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DI RELAZIONI INDUSTRIALI · 2011
Typearticle
Languageit
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Governance and Law
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Questo scritto introduce uno studio comparato sugli effetti indotti dalla sentenza della Corte del lavoro svedese. Oltre ad alcuni riferimenti alla teoria di Lord Wedderburn sulla titolaritŕ del diritto di sciopero in diversi ordinamenti europei, si fa riferimento alle recenti proposte del rapporto Monti, per inquadrare i possibili sviluppi della controversa giurisprudenza della Corte di giustizia, seguita da una ancora piů discutibile decisione dei giudici svedesi.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.012
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.054

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.012
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.028
Scholarly communication0.0180.010
Open science0.0010.011
Research integrity0.0050.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.066
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.165 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGIORNALE DI DIRITTO DEL LAVORO E DI RELAZIONI INDUSTRIALISame topicCorporate Governance and LawFrench-language works237,207