MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Testing the fragmentation limit in the Upper Sco association★

2011· article· en· W2107775851 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
N. Lodieu, N. C. Hambly, P. D. Dobbie, N. J. G. Cross, L. Christensen, E. L. Martín, L. Valdivielso

Bibliographic record

VenueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsTelescopeAstrophysicsSpectrographSkyInfrared telescopeAstronomyBrown dwarfInfraredStellar classificationProper motionStar clusterSpectral lineGalaxyStars

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present the results of a deep (J∼ 21 at 5σ) infrared photometric survey of a 0.95-deg2 area in the central region of the Upper Sco association. The photometric observations consist of a deep Y+J-band image obtained with the Wide Field Camera on the United Kingdom Infra-Red Telescope (UKIRT) with part coverage in Z complemented by the methane ON and OFF imaging survey conducted with the Wide-field InfraRed Camera on the Canada–France–Hawaii Telescope. We have selected five potential T-type objects belonging to the Upper Sco association on the basis of their blue methane colours and their J− CH4 off colours. We have also identified a sample of seven to eight Upper Sco member candidates bridging the gap between known cluster M types and our new T-type candidates. These candidates were selected based on their positions in various colour–magnitude diagrams, and they follow the sequence of known Upper Sco members identified in the UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey Galactic Clusters Survey. We present additional membership constraints using proper motion estimates from the multiple epochs available with us. We also present optical and near-infrared spectra obtained with the X-Shooter spectrograph on the Very Large Telescope for five L-type candidates covering the 0.6–2.5 m wavelength range, none of which is confirmed as a young brown dwarf. We discuss the lack of detection of new candidate members as well as the possible turn-down in the Upper Sco mass function as we are approaching the fragmentation limit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.060

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations21
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMonthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society→Same topicStellar, planetary, and galactic studies→French-language works237,207→