MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107779131 · doi:10.1103/physrevb.65.115423

Scanning tunneling spectroscopy on crossed carbon nanotubes

2002· article· en· W2107779131 on OpenAlexfundno aff
J. W. Janssen, Serge G. Lemay, Leo P. Kouwenhoven, Cees Dekker

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical review. B, Condensed matter · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCarbon Nanotubes in Composites
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsScanning tunneling microscopeScanning tunneling spectroscopyMaterials scienceSpectroscopyCarbon nanotubeLocal density of statesQuantum tunnellingCondensed matter physicsElectronic structureDensity of statesBand bendingMolecular physicsChemical physicsNanotechnologyPhysicsOptoelectronicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Crossing nanotubes were investigated using scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) and spectroscopy. From the analysis of the measured mechanical deformation of the nanotubes, the contact force between the nanotubes is estimated to be 1 nN. Spectroscopy measurements showed two effects on the electronic structure: (i) band bending, which we attribute to a position-dependent interaction with the substrate, and (ii) the formation of localized states, as signalled by additional peaks in the density of states at the crossing point. The existence of localized states at the junction represents a much stronger perturbation of the electronic structure than has generally been assumed. The relevance of these STM results for the interpretation of transport measurements is discussed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.006

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical review. B, Condensed matterSame topicCarbon Nanotubes in CompositesFrench-language works237,207