MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107790428 · doi:10.1139/p11-005

A visible spectral survey from the Alcator C-Mod tokamak<sup>1</sup>This article is part of a Special Issue on the 10th International Colloquium on Atomic Spectra and Oscillator Strengths for Astrophysical and Laboratory Plasmas.

2011· article· en· W2107790428 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Alexander Graf, M. J. May, P. Beiersdörfer

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicMagnetic confinement fusion research
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersLawrence Livermore National LaboratoryU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsAlcator C-ModPhysicsTokamakAtomic physicsPlasmaSpectral lineIonDeuteriumEmission spectrumPlasma diagnosticsNuclear physics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A visible spectral survey (3675–6744 Å) from the Alcator C-Mod tokamak has been performed using a high-resolution visible spectrometer constructed at the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The Alcator C-Mod deuterium plasma is shown to have visible emission from numerous atomic species and low charge state ions including, D I, B II–III, B V, C II–III, N II–III, O II–IV, F II–III, Ne I, Na X, Al II–III, Si I–II, Cl II–III, Ar I–III, Ar X, Ti I and III, Fe I–III, Cu I, and III, Mo I, and W I. Nearly all of the emission is thought to come from the cooler edge of the plasma including the scrape-off layer, outside of the last closed magnetic flux surface. However, there is at least one example, included here, where intrinsic visible emission persists deeper into the plasma.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicMagnetic confinement fusion researchFrench-language works237,207