MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107796859 · doi:10.1504/ijcnds.2009.026558

Cognitive networking of large scale wireless systems

2009· article· en· W2107796859 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Communication Networks and Distributed Systems · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicOpportunistic and Delay-Tolerant Networks
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceComputer networkWireless WANCognitive radioWireless networkMunicipal wireless networkWi-Fi arrayWireless mesh networkWireless broadbandWirelessKey distribution in wireless sensor networksRadio resource managementCognitive networkQuality of serviceMulti-frequency networkDistributed computingTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We propose the concept of cognitive networking for large-scale wireless systems, which opportunistically utilises network resources including both spectrum bandwidth and radio availability. Both types of resources cannot be predetermined in large-scale wireless systems, due to various reasons such as interferences and dynamic traffic load. The proposed technology not only establishes dynamic wireless networks, but also provides for reliable network quality of services (QoS). The supporting network architecture, embedded wireless interconnect (EWI), is proposed to implement the cognitive networking concept and supply an effective application-programming interface for large-scale data management systems. Two example applications are presented, including wireless mesh networks for broadband wireless internet access and wireless sensor networks for target tracking. Major advantages of the technology are further discussed. We suggest that the performance of the proposed system would improve with larger network scale and the implementation complexity could be independent of the network scale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.985
Threshold uncertainty score0.567

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it