In vivo recruitment of exon junction complex proteins to transcription sites in mammalian cell nuclei
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Studies over the past years indicate that there is extensive coupling between nuclear export of mRNA and pre-mRNA processing. Here, we visualized the distribution of exon junction complex (EJC) proteins and RNA export factors relative to sites of abundant pre-mRNA synthesis in the nucleus. We analyzed both HeLa cells infected with adenovirus and murine erythroleukemia (MEL) cells stably transfected with the human beta-globin gene. Using in situ hybridization and confocal microscopy, we observe accumulation of EJC proteins (REF/Aly, Y14, SRm160, UAP56, RNPS1, and Magoh) and core spliceosome components (U snRNPs) at sites of transcription. This suggests that EJC proteins bind stably to pre-mRNA cotranscriptionally. No concentration of the export factors NXF1/TAP, p15, and Dbp5 was detected on nascent transcripts, arguing that in mammalian cells these proteins bind the mRNA shortly before or after release from the sites of transcription. These results also suggest that binding of EJC proteins to the mRNA is not sufficient to recruit TAP-p15, consistent with recent findings showing that the EJC does not play a crucial role in mRNA export. Contrasting to the results obtained in MEL cells expressing normal human beta-globin transcripts, mutant pre-mRNAs defective in splicing and 3'end processing do not colocalize with SRm160, REF, UAP56, or Sm proteins. This shows that the accumulation of EJC proteins at transcription sites requires efficient processing of the nascent pre-mRNAs, arguing that transcription per se is not sufficient for the stable assembly of the EJC.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it