The Legal and Jurisprudence-Related Essentials of the Wage for the Wife’s Work
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The various aspects of the rights of women in the family and society have not been elucidated and explicated in terms of Islamic law and jurisprudence up to now. In this legal system, the spouses will have rights and responsibilities relating to each other following the conclusion of the marriage contract; however, since the wife does have economic independence, she is liable to receive wage and remuneration in lieu of what she does as per the implicit or explicit request of her husband. Taking advantage of the wife’s work without paying her wage causes damage and harm to her and according to the rule of prohibition of detriment, the vindicator is obliged to pay the wage. Additionally, under certain circumstances, the wife is entitled to receive an amount of money called matrimony donation. On the other hand, the wife is entitled to have a job; however, it is not her responsibility, so it is possible that she prefers to work at home instead of working outside and in this context, job is considered to have a general meaning which should be protected. In the present article, we investigate the issue of wage from the viewpoint of jurisprudence and law figuring out in which cases the wife is entitled to receive wage and matrimony donation. For example, the question is whether she is entitled to receive wage once the guardianship of the child is entrusted to her. Although the woman has rights and responsibilities in the family, having a job, including one at home or outside are not among her obligations and therefore she is entitled to receive wage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.038 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.005 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".