A Novel Fuzzy Approach for State Estimation of Nonlinear Hybrid Systems Using Particle Filtering Method
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Reliable state estimation is challenging for nonlinear hybrid systems. Particle filtering has emerged as an appealing approach for online hybrid state estimation. Mode detection in nonlinear hybrid systems is, however, a troublesome issue for the conventional particle filter mainly due to sample impoverishment. The problem is also exacerbated when dynamics that govern healthy or faulty modes are close together. False mode detection consequently leads to erroneous continuous state estimation. This paper proposes a novel fuzzy‐based particle filter to reduce continuous state estimation errors due to failures in mode detection. It is fulfilled by considering a fuzzified contribution of each feasible mode in overall estimation. In addition, two new resampling strategies are presented to tackle the degeneracy problem. A set of simulation test studies are conducted to extract the characteristic features and evaluate the performance of the proposed algorithm compared to observation and transition‐based most likely modes tracking particle filter (OTPF) as one of the most meticulous proposed estimation algorithms. The simulation results demonstrate the superior efficiency of the algorithm in dealing with the considered potential estimation problems.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".