MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107871085 · doi:10.1177/0267659113513312

Prophylactic fibrinogen administration during complex congenital cardiac surgery leading to thrombosis of a patient’s brachial artery and the cardiopulmonary bypass circuit: a case report

2013· article· en· W2107871085 on OpenAlex
RDP Stanzel, Mark Henderson, SB O’Blenes

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePerfusion · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTrauma, Hemostasis, Coagulopathy, Resuscitation
Canadian institutionsCapital District Health Authority
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineHemostasisCardiopulmonary bypassFibrinogenFibrinCardiac surgeryThrombosisPopulationCardiologyBlood productThrombinSurgeryAnesthesiaInternal medicinePlateletImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cardiac surgery represents one of the largest consumers of blood products due to the level of blood loss in these patients. As such, there is considerable interest in hemostatic therapies for this patient population. A hemostatic agent that has recently garnered interest is fibrinogen. The conversion of fibrinogen to fibrin by activated thrombin results in clot formation, leading to hemostasis. Currently, a number of studies are underway to evaluate the efficacy of fibrinogen concentrate in cardiac surgery patients. While potentially beneficial in hemostasis for cardiac patients, the current case report provides evidence of the importance of timing in the administration of this product.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.667
Threshold uncertainty score0.666

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.031
GPT teacher head0.269
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it