MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

The Interaction Nature of Br-with 1-(4-Butylamino)-3-Methyl Imidazolium

2012· article· en· W2107892691 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Lijuan Yang, Baichuan He

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Applied Solution Chemistry and Modeling · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicIonic liquids properties and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
KeywordsNatural bond orbitalChemistryHydrogen bondInteraction energyIonSuperposition principleComputational chemistryIonic bondingPotential energyChemical physicsCrystallographyAtomic physicsMoleculePhysicsDensity functional theoryQuantum mechanicsOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An ionic liquid (IL) interaction system of Br- with 1-(4-butylamino)-3-methyl imidazolium([Bamim]+) were investigated using B3LYP and MP2 methods at 6-311++G** level. Three possible stable geometry structures of this IL system were optimized. The energies of these three structures and ion-pair considering zero point energy (ZPE) and basis sets superposition energy (BSSE) correction were calculated. The results show that the interactions between ([Bamim]+) and Br- are mainly hydrogen bonds(H-bonds); the interaction energies between ion-pairs are larger than -350KJ/mol, which are far beyond those of H-bonds; the interaction nature of Br- with cation is studied based on natural bond orbital (NBO) calculation and the results show that the electrostatic attraction force plays a very important role in the interaction energy between ion-pair.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.233 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Applied Solution Chemistry and ModelingSame topicIonic liquids properties and applicationsFrench-language works237,207