MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107893226 · doi:10.1109/glocom.2006.855

WLC41-3: On the Performance of Cooperative Wireless Fixed Relays in Asymmetric Channels

2006· article· en· W2107893226 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobecom · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRelayComputer scienceHop (telecommunications)Computer networkReliability (semiconductor)WirelessNode (physics)Wireless networkOutage probabilitySignal strengthExpression (computer science)Relay channelBit error rateTopology (electrical circuits)TelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)EngineeringElectrical engineeringPower (physics)Fading

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In many scenarios the commonly assumed symmetry in multiple relay channels is unrealistic. Therefore, this paper, through analytical and simulation efforts, investigates asymmetric relay deployment where the links of cooperating nodes to destination experience unequal signal strength. An analysis of the cooperative error rate at the destination node in such networks is presented. Using the derived expressions for the cooperative error, in conjunction with the approaches used in earlier works, the end-to-end (E2E) performance of a two- hop network can be obtained. Moreover, the derived expression represents, in certain scenarios, a tight bound for the E2E error rate of the two-hop network such as when relay adopts threshold decode-and-forward strategy and/or multi-antenna processing to improve the reliability of its detection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.858
Threshold uncertainty score0.328

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it