Unequal Partners, Unequal Exchange: Goldcorp, the Mexican State, and Campesino Dispossession at the Peñasquito Goldmine
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La nueva geografía de la minería de tajo a cielo abierto en América Latina se extiende al México rural, con efectos drásticos sobre la tierra, el agua y otros recursos de subsistencia de las sociedades campesinas. Este estudio muestra cómo una empresa minera canadiense ganó el control de la tierra y agua necesaria para operar la mina Peñasquito en el norte de Zacatecas; cómo desactivó las protestas campesinas posteriores, y como ha logrado tomar grandes volúmenes de riqueza mineral a cambio de compensaciones minúsculas a la sociedad local. El papel de los agentes del Estado en la negociación y la interpretación de los contratos legales resultantes es particularmente significativo. Los investigadores debieran examinar las tácticas que las corporaciones mineras utilizan para tomar territorialidades campesinas y acallar la protesta campesina, porque éstas dan forma a un proceso más general de un desigual intercambio económico y ecológico.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".