MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Characterization of a carboxypeptidase A gene from the mosquito, <i>Aedes aegypti</i>

2000· article· en· W2107912915 on OpenAlexaff
Marten J. Edwards, L. A. Moskalyk, M. Donelly‐Doman, M. Vlaskova, Fernando G. Noriega, Virginia K. Walker, Marcelo Jacobs‐Lorena

Bibliographic record

VenueInsect Molecular Biology · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicInsect symbiosis and bacterial influences
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
KeywordsAedes aegyptiBiologyAnopheles gambiaeMidgutCarboxypeptidaseMessenger RNAMolecular biologyGeneOpen reading frameCarboxypeptidase AGene expressionAedesIn situ hybridizationGeneticsPeptide sequenceBiochemistryLarvaEnzymeImmunologyBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A gut-specific carboxypeptidase A gene (AeCPA) from the mosquito, Aedes aegypti, was cloned and characterized. The gene has an open reading frame that predicts a protein of 427 amino acids, 61% of which are identical to an Anopheles gambiae carboxypeptidase A sequence. AeCPA messenger RNA (mRNA) was not detected during larval and pupal development. In situ hybridization experiments indicated that AeCPA mRNA is expressed by posterior midgut epithelial cells. In sharp contrast to An. gambiae carboxypeptidase A gene expression, AeCPA mRNA accumulates to high levels only late ( approximately 16-24 h) after ingestion of a blood meal. The temporal profile of AeCPA gene induction is similar to that of Ae. aegypti late trypsin, suggesting the existence of common regulatory elements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.209
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations69
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInsect Molecular BiologySame topicInsect symbiosis and bacterial influencesFrench-language works237,207