Analyse d’un programme de développement des productions fruitières en Polynésie française
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Note technique Analysis of a development program of the fruit-bearing trees in French Polynesia.Abstract --Context and project presentation.After a short history and general view of fruit-bearing tree crops in French Polynesia, the functioning and operations programed over 3 years of a support project carried out from 2002 to 2005 are presented.Realization.The five principal topics of action are successively described: improvement of the vegetable material; accompanying research; training, extension and farmer organization and training: topic supplemented by the drafting of technical documents; evaluation missions and training courses; quality approach and professional organization, supplemented by a part on commodity development by processing.Results and inventoried resources are analyzed.Discussion and conclusion.Benefits and disadvantages encountered in the project realization are discussed and make it possible to propose some improvements in the implementation of similar projects.French Polynesia / fruit growing / agricultural development / surveys / plant introduction / choice of species Analyse d'un programme de développement des productions fruitières en Polynésie française.Résumé --Contexte et présentation du projet.Après un bref historique et un aperçu général de l'arboriculture fruitière en Polynésie française, le fonctionnement et les opérations programmées sur 3 ans d'un projet d'appui mené de 2002 à 2005 sont présentés.Réalisation.Les cinq thèmes principaux d'intervention sont successivement décrits : amélioration du matériel végétal ; recherches d'accompagnement ; formation, vulgarisation et encadrement : volet complété par la rédaction de documents techniques ; missions d'appui et stages ; démarche qualité et organisation de la profession, complété par un volet de valorisation des produits par transformation.Les résultats et les moyens utilisés sont analysés.Discussion et conclusion.Les avantages et inconvénients rencontrés dans la réalisation du projet sont discutés et permettent de proposer quelques améliorations dans la mise en œuvre de projets analogues.Polynésie française / culture fruitière / développement agricole / enquête / introduction de plantes / choix des espèces
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".