Molecular Characterization and Expression Analysis of <i>S1 self‐incompatibility Locus‐linked Pollen 3.15</i> Gene in <i>Citrus reticulata</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gametophytic self-incompatibility (GSI) is controlled by a highly polymorphic locus called the S-locus, which is an important factor that can result in seedless fruit in Citrus. The S1 self-incompatibility locus-linked pollen 3.15 gene (S1-3.15 ) belongs to a type of S locus gene. The role of S1-3.15 in the SI reaction of Citrus has not yet been reported. In this study, full-length sequences of cDNA and DNA encoding the S1-3.15 gene, referred to as CrS1-3.15 , were isolated from 'Wuzishatangju' (Self-incompatibility, SI) and 'Shatangju' (Self-compatibility, SC). The predicted amino acid sequences of CrS1-3.15 between 'Wuzishatangju' and 'Shatangju' differ by only three amino acids. Compared to 'Wuzishatangju', three bases were substituted in the genomic DNA of CrS1-3.15 from 'Shatangju'. Southern blot results showed that one copy of CrS1-3.15 existed in the genomic DNA of both 'Wuzishatangju' and 'Shatangju'. The expression level of the CrS1-3.15 gene in the ovaries of 'Shatangju' was approximately 60-fold higher than that in the ovaries of 'Wuzishatangju'. When 'Wuzishatangju' was cross-pollinated, the expression of CrS1-3.15 was upregulated in the ovaries at 3 d, and the highest expression levels were detected in the ovaries at 6 d after cross-pollination of 'Wuzishatangju' × 'Shatangju'. To obtain the CrS1-3.15 protein, the full-length cDNA of CrS1-3.15 genes from 'Wuzishatangju' and 'Shatangju' was successfully expressed in Pichia pastoris. Pollen germination frequency of 'Wuzishatangju' was inhibited significantly with increasing CrS1-3.15 protein concentrations from SI 'Wuzishatangju'.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".