MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107929276 · doi:10.1152/ajpheart.00734.2005

Chronic systemic delivery of angiopoietin-2 reveals a possible independent angiogenic effect

2006· article· en· W2107929276 on OpenAlexaff
W. Bureau, Paul Van Slyke, Robin N. N. Han, Nicole L. Ward, D. Stewart, Daniel Dumont

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicAngiogenesis and VEGF in Cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoSunnybrook Health Science Centre
FundersNational Cancer Institute
KeywordsAngiopoietin 2AngiogenesisAngiopoietinLungNeovascularizationMedicineVascular endothelial growth factorGenetically modified mouseTransgeneAngiopoietin receptorCardiologyInternal medicineVEGF receptorsCancer researchEndocrinologyBiologyGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Angiopoietin-2 has been implicated in the angiogenic response; however, this response has been tied to the expression of VEGF, and an independent angiogenic role has yet to be described. In this report, we detail the generation of transgenic mice that conditionally express angiopoietin-2 in the liver, resulting in sustained increases in circulating levels. These animals survive gestation and present with several vascular abnormalities, including an increase in the diameter of myocardial coronary vessels and a reduction in the density of endocardial vessels. In the lung, prominent increases in vessel diameter were observed. These vascular remodeling changes occurred in the absence of any apparent increase in VEGF expression. Our results illustrate that chronic systemic delivery of angiopoietin-2 induces angiogenesis in the absence of increased VEGF expression and that angiopoietin-2 promotes myocardial coronary vessel remodeling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.850
Threshold uncertainty score0.942

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.229
Teacher spread0.224 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory PhysiologySame topicAngiogenesis and VEGF in CancerFrench-language works237,207