MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107933621 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2014-0616

A first-principles study of bulk aluminum at high pressure

2014· article· en· W2107933621 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jing‐Zhe Nie, L. Ao, Fengai Zhao, Ming Jiang, Xiaotao Zu

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicHigh-pressure geophysics and materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompressibilityThermodynamicsGibbs free energyPhysicsPhase transitionAb initioVolume (thermodynamics)Phase (matter)Zero temperatureAluminiumAtmospheric temperature rangeRange (aeronautics)Transition temperatureEnergy densityCondensed matter physicsMaterials scienceTheoretical physicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Using ab initio total energy calculations based on density functional theory and a procedure based on minimization of the Gibbs free energy, we calculate the Gibbs free energy for face-centered cubic and hexagonal close-packed aluminum in the temperature range from 0 to 900 K. It is shown that at zero temperature an fcc → hcp phase transition occurs at 181 GPa, and when the temperature is increased to 900 K the phase transition pressure increases slightly. As the pressure increases, the Grüneisen parameter first decreases significantly, then increase sharply at the phase transition pressure, and finally decrease again with further increasing volume compressibility. It turns out that the temperature and pressure have considerable effects on the Grüneisen parameter in certain ranges.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.187
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicHigh-pressure geophysics and materialsFrench-language works237,207