MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107937238 · doi:10.1144/sp278.5

Correlation of Middle Devonian Hamilton Group-equivalent strata in east-central North America: implications for eustasy, tectonics and faunal provinciality

2007· article· en· W2107937238 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Alexander Bartholomew, C. E. BRETT

Bibliographic record

VenueGeological Society London Special Publications · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of Fossils
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDevonianGeologyPaleontologyTectonicsGroup (periodic table)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract An integrated approach, involving nearly all available biostratigraphic data, event and sequence stratigraphy, has been utilized in correlation of the Middle Devonian (latest Eifelian–Givetian) Hamilton Group and equivalent strata in north-central North America. This approach permits high-resolution correlation of strata equivalent to the Oatka Creek (upper Marcellus), Skaneateles, Ludlowville and Moscow Formations from New York into sections bordering the Michigan Basin in Ontario, Canada, as well as southern Michigan, northern Ohio and Indiana, USA. Most member and submember-scale units, herein slightly redefined and interpreted as 3rd and 4th order sequences, respectively, and their bounding condensed beds can be correlated regionally. Moreover, many faunal patterns also persist across this region, which, together with sequence stratigraphy, provides a bridge for correlation into the Michigan Basin. The detailed stratigraphy presented herein permits a more-resolved understanding of far-field tectonics, eustasy and biotic responses during the Middle Devonian. Allocyclic processes, primarily eustasy, played a key role in generating persistent sedimentary cycles. Episodes of rapid mud sedimentation occurred over large areas of the cratonic interior, distal to Acadian source terrains. The major Algonquin–Findlay Arch, which presently separates the Michigan Basin from the Appalachian foreland basin, was not present during deposition of these strata. Conversely, a roughly north–south trending region, running approximately through present-day Cleveland, Ohio, was first a local subsiding area during late Eifelian–early Givetian time and then underwent topographic inversion to form a local arch at which upper Hamilton units were condensed and then bevelled during the later Givetian; we infer that this feature may represent a migrating forebulge. Finally, fossil biotas do not show strong partitioning into Appalachian and Michigan basin faunal subprovinces during the early Givetian, as there appears to have been no physical barrier to migration at least in the study area. However, Hamilton-equivalent strata in the most proximal portion of the Appalachian Basin do show a relatively minor admixture of typical Michigan Basin taxa with normal Hamilton forms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.231
Threshold uncertainty score0.460

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations22
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeological Society London Special PublicationsSame topicPaleontology and Stratigraphy of FossilsFrench-language works237,207