MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107939387

Analysis of the Solar Radiation Distribution and Passive Thermal Response of an Attached Solarium/Greenhouse

2010· article· en· W2107939387 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Diane Bastien, Andreas Athienitis

Bibliographic record

VenuePurdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnergy
TopicSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadiosity (computer graphics)Environmental scienceRadiationRoofThermalGreenhouseSolar gainPassive solar building designMeteorologySunlightLatitudeAtmospheric sciencesThermal radiationOpticsPhysicsEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a detailed model for the distribution of solar radiation and the transient thermal response of a solarium/greenhouse.The objective is to optimize the geometrical configuration to obtain the highest air temperature inside the solarium for the coldest period in Montreal (latitude of 45 N).In this study, a combination of ray tracing and radiosity methods are used to calculate the solar radiation absorbed by interior surfaces.Then a detailed transient thermal analysis using heat balance method is performed to simulate the passive thermal response of the solarium/greenhouse.Solar radiation absorbed by interior surfaces and inside air temperatures for various roof tilt angles and interior surfaces absorptances are presented.Although a solarium design with a roof slope of 65°does not always absorb the maximum solar radiation, this configuration experiences the highest minimum and maximum indoor air temperatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePurdue e-Pubs (Purdue University System)Same topicSolar Thermal and Photovoltaic SystemsFrench-language works237,207