MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2107983044 · doi:10.1007/s00198-012-1958-1

A framework for the development of guidelines for the management of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

2012· review· en· W2107983044 on OpenAlexaff
Sarath Lekamwasam, Jonathan D. Adachi, D. Agnusdei, JP Bilezikian, Steven Boonen, Fredrik Borgström, Cyrus Cooper, Richard Eastell, Lorenz C. Hofbauer, John А. Kanis, Bente Langdahl, O. M. Lesnyak, Roman Lorenc, Eugène McCloskey, Osvaldo Daniel Messina, Nicola Napoli, Barbara Obermayer‐Pietsch, Stuart H. Ralston, Philip N. Sambrook, S. Silverman, J Štěpán, G. Suppan, D. A. Wahl, Juliet Compston

Bibliographic record

VenueOsteoporosis International · 2012
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersNational Institute for Health and Care Research
KeywordsMedicineGuidelineFRAXOsteoporosisGlucocorticoidIntervention (counseling)Physical therapyIntensive care medicineInternal medicineOsteoporotic fracturePathologyNursingBone mineral

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.025
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.024
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0250.024
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0070.004
Bibliometrics0.0150.010
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0070.006
Open science0.0080.004
Research integrity0.0090.013
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.281
GPT teacher head0.486
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations336
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueOsteoporosis InternationalSame topicBone health and osteoporosis researchFrench-language works237,207