MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108037775 · doi:10.1109/pimrc.1995.476887

Simple equalization scheme for high rate FSK data transmission in the millimeter wave frequency band

2002· article· en· W2108037775 on OpenAlexaff
Chandra S. Bontu, D.D. Falconer, L. Strawczynski

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Engineering and Waveguides
Canadian institutionsBell (Canada)Carleton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntersymbol interferenceDemodulationFrequency-shift keyingEqualization (audio)Electronic engineeringChannel (broadcasting)Computer scienceTransmission (telecommunications)Interference (communication)Modulation (music)Adjacent-channel interferenceNyquist ISI criterionData transmissionTelecommunicationsPhysicsAcousticsEngineeringComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In a typical indoor channel, the channel dispersion varies from 10 ns to 100 ns depending on the physical dimensions of the building, the material of the walls etc. Therefore, for high rate data transmission around 160 Mbps, the signals experience severe intersymbol interference (ISI). A simple channel equalization strategy is described for data transmission at around 160 Mbps in the millimeter wave frequency band. CPFSK, a constant envelope modulation, is selected as the modulation scheme. The proposed receivers consist of a noncoherent demodulator followed by a nonlinear equalizer. Performance results of the proposed systems are presented for a two path quasi-static channel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMicrowave Engineering and WaveguidesFrench-language works237,207