MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108041217 · doi:10.1016/s0001-2092(06)61635-9

Responding to a Fire at a Pediatric Hospital

2002· article· en· W2108041217 on OpenAlex
Catherine A. Hogan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAORN Journal · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicDisaster Response and Management
Canadian institutionsHospital for Sick Children
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPreparednessDisaster preparednessMedical emergencyDisaster planningHealth careKey (lock)Emergency managementDisaster responseSuicide preventionMedicinePoison controlNursingComputer securityPolitical scienceComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Disaster preparedness in health care organizations facilitates a formalized response to major incidents or disasters. This article reviews a man-made disaster, a fire at a large pediatric hospital. How the fire started, patient evacuation, redirecting services, timing of events, key players, geographic factors, communications, and recovery and restoration of care are discussed. Lessons learned and Information on disaster preparedness also are presented.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.140
Threshold uncertainty score0.994

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.379
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it