Assess the Rating of SMEs by using Classification And Regression Trees (CART) with Qualitative Variables
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Italian banks have never used the credit rating system to grant funds to SMEs until the introduction of Basel II accord. Credit Rating Systems use financial ratios that are often not adapted to SMEs' assessment. In fact, small and medium-size enterprises are characterized by a high level of intangible assets. Some researchers focus their attention on the evaluation of qualitative variables of SMEs (management; corporate governance; SMEs-territory relationship), but no research is able to integrate these SMEs¡¯ qualitative variables into a single scoring model, or to sufficiently consider the characteristics of SMEs-financial markets relationship. This paper proposes a specific credit scoring model to SMEs' assessment which includes all these variables combining two methods: Altman¡¯s ¡®EM-Score¡¯ and CART (Classification and Regression Tree). This model is performed on a sample of 6, 534 Italian manufacturing firms getting a high level of reliability.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it