Thymidine Decomposition Induced by Low-Energy Electrons and Soft X Rays under N<sub>2</sub>and O<sub>2</sub>Atmospheres
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel technique has been employed to investigate the simultaneous damage to DNA components induced by soft X rays (1.5 keV) and low-energy electrons (0-30 eV) in thin films of thymidine deposited on glass and tantalum substrates and irradiated under atmospheric pressure and temperature. The films were surrounded by either an N2 or O2 environment. The formation of four radiation-induced products is reported in this article: base release, 5-hydroxymethyl-2'-deoxyuridine (5-HMdUrd), 5-formyl-2'-deoxyuridine (5-FordUrd) and 5,6-dihydrothymidine (5,6-DHThd). Analysis with LC-MS/MS shows larger damage yields in the samples deposited on tantalum than in those deposited on glass, which is attributed to the interaction of the additional low-energy electrons that are photoemitted from the metal surface. From a comparison of the results obtained from N2 and O2 environment, we report a dramatic effect from 6 O2: an approximately threefold increase in the yield of products, attributed to the reaction of O2 with initial carbon-centered thymidine radicals generated in the film during irradiation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".