Chemotherapy Dosing Schedule Influences Drug Resistance Development in Ovarian Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Drug resistance leads to chemotherapy failure and is responsible for the death of a great majority of patients with metastatic, late-stage ovarian cancer. The present study addressed whether changes in the chemotherapy dosing schedule affect the development, further worsening, or circumvention of drug resistance in chemosensitive and chemoresistant ovarian cancer. Severe combined immunodeficient mice bearing HeyA8 and HeyA8-MDR xenografts were treated with docetaxel intermittently (1×/wk or 3×/wk) or continuously for 21 days. Tumor mRNA expression of genes implicated in docetaxel resistance was measured by quantitative real-time-PCR. Analyzed genes included those encoding for the drug efflux transporters mdr1 and mrp7 and for molecules that interfere with or overcome the effects of docetaxel, including β-tubulinIII, actinin4, stathmin1, bcl2, rpn2, thoredoxin, and akt2. In both models, continuous docetaxel resulted in greater antitumor efficacy than 1×/wk or 3×/wk dosing and did not induce upregulation of any analyzed genes. Once weekly dosing caused upregulation of various drug resistance-related genes, especially in chemoresistant xenografts. More frequent, 3×/wk dosing diminished this effect, although levels of various genes were higher than for continuous chemotherapy. Drug efflux transporter expression was further examined by Western blotting, confirming that intermittent, but not continuous, docetaxel induced significant upregulation. Overall, our results show that the presence and length of treatment-free intervals contribute to the development of drug resistance. Elimination of these intervals by continuous dosing resulted in superior antitumor efficacy and prevented drug resistance induction in chemosensitive and chemoresistant disease. These results encourage the clinical implementation of continuous chemotherapy to overcome and/or prevent drug resistance in newly diagnosed and recurrent, refractory ovarian cancer.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".