MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Glacial-Isostatic Adjustment-I. The Forward Problem

2007· article· en· W2108053734 on OpenAlexaff
W. R. Peltier, John T. Andrews

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical Society · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysics and Gravity Measurements
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHeaviside step functionGeologyIce sheetPost-glacial reboundLithosphereIsostasyGeophysicsMantle (geology)Glacial periodClassification of discontinuitiesDeglaciationAsthenosphereGeodesyMathematical analysisPaleontologyGeomorphologyMathematicsTectonics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The isostatic adjustment of a radially stratified visco-elastic spheroid is treated using space-time Green functions for the associated surface mass load boundary value problem. These impulse response functions are convolved with a Heaviside function to give the time dependent deformation of the planet which would be produced by a unit point mass brought up from infinity at t= 0 and allowed to remain on the surface. The resulting ‘Heaviside Green functions’ can be employed to simulate all of the important signatures of glacial isostatic adjustment. Given a space-time dependent surface mass load consisting of ice sheet ablation histories and a model of the simultaneous filling of the ocean basins, these source terms are simply convolved with the Heaviside Green function appropriate to a specific response signature. A realistic model of the spatial distribution of the main late Pleistocene ice loads and of their temporal disintegration is constructed. The response of two visco-elastic earth models is computed and compared to a global set of relaxation data (relative sea-level curves). On the basis of this initial comparison of theory and observation the possibility that the lower mantle has a viscosity which is significantly in excess of the viscosity of the upper mantle is excluded. In addition, clear evidence of the presence of the lithosphere has been found in relaxation data from sites which were near the edge of the Laurentide ice sheet. Such data should therefore prove useful as a basis for analysis of lateral variations in lithosphere thickness. Further extensions of the calculation are suggested.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.035

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations525
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Journal of the Royal Astronomical SocietySame topicGeophysics and Gravity MeasurementsFrench-language works237,207