MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108063243 · doi:10.1002/net.20396

Nonadaptive broadcasting in trees

2010· article· en· W2108063243 on OpenAlexafffund
Hovhannes A. Harutyunyan, Arthur L. Liestman, Kazuhisa Makino, Thomas C. Shermer

Bibliographic record

VenueNetworks · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicInterconnection Networks and Systems
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser UniversityConcordia University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsVertex (graph theory)Broadcasting (networking)Computer scienceUpper and lower boundsTree (set theory)CombinatoricsTime complexityGraphMathematicsDiscrete mathematicsTheoretical computer scienceAlgorithmComputer network

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We study nonadaptive broadcasting in trees, a process of sending a message from one vertex in a tree to all other vertices. In the nonadaptive model, each vertex has a specified, ordered list of its neighbors. After receiving a broadcast message, a vertex sends the message to its neighbors, one after another, in the order specified by the list. The broadcast is completed when all vertices have received the message. We obtain lower and upper bounds on the minimum time required to complete a nonadaptive broadcast in a tree and improved upper bounds for general graphs. We give a polynomial time algorithm for determining the minimum nonadaptive broadcast time of any given tree. We also show how to construct the largest possible trees having a given nonadaptive broadcast time. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. NETWORKS, Vol. 57(2), 157–168 2011

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.014

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.005
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNetworksSame topicInterconnection Networks and SystemsFrench-language works237,207