MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108097976 · doi:10.7202/000325ar

Significations de la responsabilité parentale à la naissance de l'enfant et après son adolescence

2002· article· fr· W2108097976 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Vincenzo Cicchelli, Emmanuelle Maunaye

Bibliographic record

VenueLien social et Politiques · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Power and Status Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Au-delà des acceptions du droit civil et du droit pénal, la responsabilité se définit comme un lien intime entre Ego et son prochain. Les parents en sont des paradigmes éminents. Leur responsabilité évolue selon l'âge des enfants et les moments de l'éducation. La vigilance continue et la disponibilité totale qui caractérisent le rapport de la mère à son premier enfant accentuent l'asymétrie du rapport parental. On a ainsi pu parler de société sans père. Pour autant, la paternité ne se définit pas en creux : une autre modalité de la responsabilité parentale se dessine, fondée sur le soutien à la mère puis sur la conscience d'un rôle éducatif, plus projeté dans l'avenir. À l'adolescence, l'objectif des parents est de faire advenir la maturité, en se donnant comme médiateurs et accompagnateurs du processus. Les dispositifs monétaires sont l'un des aspects les plus révélateurs de cette nouvelle modalité de la responsabilité parentale. L'écartement progressif de la vie des enfants après le départ du foyer parental constitue encore une modalité de la responsabilité, par laquelle les parents transmettent à leurs enfants la charge de l'entretien des liens qui les unissent.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.019
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.380
Teacher spread0.329 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLien social et PolitiquesSame topicSocial Power and Status DynamicsFrench-language works237,207