MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108100669 · doi:10.1109/isie.2009.5222613

Online efficiency optimization of an IPMSM drive incorporating loss minimization algorithm and an FLC as speed controller

2009· article· en· W2108100669 on OpenAlexaff
M. Nasir Uddin, Ronald S. Rebeiro, Sheng Hua Lee

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)TorqueElectronic speed controlPID controllerComputer scienceController (irrigation)Operating speedVector controlArmature (electrical engineering)VoltageMagnetEngineeringControl engineeringInduction motorElectrical engineeringTemperature controlPhysicsControl (management)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper presents a comparison in efficiency between a fuzzy logic controller (FLC) and a proportional-integral (PI) controller based interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM) drive incorporating an online loss minimization algorithm (LMA). The LMA is developed based on the motor model. In order to maximize the operating efficiency, the d-axis armature current is controlled optimally based on the developed LMA. A novel fuzzy logic controller (FLC) is developed in such a way that it can simultaneously control both torque and flux of the motor while maintaining current and voltage constraints. Thus, the FLC extends the operating speed limits for the motor. The LMA is incorporated with the FLC so that the motor can operate over wide speed range while maintaining the high efficiency. A performance comparison of the LMA based IPMSM drive with FLC and PI controller is provided. Simulation results demonstrate the higher efficiency and better dynamic response of the FLC based drive as compared to the PI controller over a wide speed range. The complete drive is also experimentally implemented using DSP board DS1104 although the complete experimental tests are yet to be done.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.341
Threshold uncertainty score0.740

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSensorless Control of Electric MotorsFrench-language works237,207