Un symbole à bout de souffle ? Le maintien de la paix dans la culture stratégique canadienne
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objectif de cet article est d’examiner comment les opérations de maintien de la paix sont parvenues à façonner de manière aussi marquante la culture stratégique canadienne depuis plus de cinquante ans. Il s’agit plus précisément d’en analyser une dimension particulière, soit le processus de légitimation de l’usage de la force militaire par les élites politiques canadiennes, grâce à l’utilisation du symbole que représente le maintien de la paix pour les Canadiens. L’un des impacts de ce processus, vis-à-vis de pratiques militaires qui correspondent de moins en moins au symbole du maintien de la paix, est le développement d’un écart significatif entre la rhétorique et les faits. Il en résulte une crise de légitimation de l’usage de la force militaire au Canada, qui s’exprime par une ambiguïté croissante quant au rôle des Forces canadiennes sur la scène internationale, et dont l’actuel engagement militaire en Afghanistan représente le point culminant.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.012 | 0.037 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.012 | 0.008 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".