Chemoprevention of rat prostate carcinogenesis by dietary 16 -fluoro-5-androsten-17-one (fluasterone), a minimally androgenic analog of dehydroepiandrosterone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) is a potent inhibitor of prostate carcinogenesis in rats. However, concerns related to the possible androgenicity of DHEA may preclude its use for chemoprevention of human prostate cancer. Studies were performed to compare the androgenicity of DHEA and a fluorinated DHEA analog, 16alpha-fluoro-5-androsten-17-one (fluasterone), and to determine the chemopreventive activity of fluasterone in the rat prostate. Comparisons of accessory sex gland weight and histology in gonadectomized male rats demonstrated that fluasterone is less androgenic than is DHEA. Fluasterone conferred significant protection against prostate carcinogenesis induced in Wistar-Unilever rats by a sequential regimen of N-methyl-N-nitrosourea+testosterone. Chronic administration of fluasterone at levels of 2000 and 1000 mg/kg diet reduced the incidence of adenocarcinoma in the dorsolateral/anterior prostate from 64% in dietary controls to 28 and 31%, respectively. Other than a dose-related suppression of body weight gain, chronic exposure to fluasterone induced no clinical evidence of toxicity; suppression of body weight gain may be either a pharmacological effect or a minimally toxic effect of the compound. These data demonstrate that a minimally androgenic analog of DHEA protects against prostate carcinogenesis induced in rats by a chemical carcinogen + androgen. The reduced androgenicity of fluasterone may obviate toxicities associated with the androgenicity of the parent compound. On this basis, fluasterone merits consideration for evaluation in clinical trials for prostate cancer prevention. The chemopreventive activity of a non-androgenic DHEA analog suggests that at least a portion of the chemopreventive activity of DHEA in the rat prostate is unrelated to hormonal effects.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".