An examination of outdoor experience in the development of character in young adults with Type 1 Diabetes
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Connected in Motion is a not for profit organization serving young adults with \nType 1 diabetes. The organization hosted outdoor and experiential Type 1 diabetes \neducation programs in January of2009 and 2010. The weekends provided non-clinical \nalternative Type 1 diabetes education to the underserved population of young adults \nwithin Canada. Six women living with Type I diabetes and between the ages of 22 and \n30 participated in the Winter Slipstream weekends participated in this phenomenological \nresearch study. Through semi-structured interviews and artifact-elicitation interviews, \n,{ \nthe lived experiences of the participants were examined. Data analysis indicated that the \nsense of community created through outdoor programming and experiential education \nfor young adults with Type I diabetes stimulated the development of self-efficacy and \nparticipant-perceived improvement in Type 1 diabetes self-management. There was no \nindication that outdoor and experiential Type I diabetes education had any impact on the \ndevelopment of autonomy among participants. Recommendations are made to \nencourage the successful implementation of further alternative (non-clinical) Type 1 \ndiabetes education programs for young adults living with Type 1 diabetes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".