MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108195938 · doi:10.1080/14927713.2013.776745

Not fat, not skinny, functional enough to finish: interrogating constructions of health in the Ironman Triathlon

2013· article· en· W2108195938 on OpenAlexaffvenue
William Bridel

Bibliographic record

VenueLeisure/Loisir · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSport and Mega-Event Impacts
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEliteAthletesConstruct (python library)SociologyPsychologyGender studiesMedicinePolitical sciencePhysical therapyLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sport has long been popularly promoted as a way to improve one's health through participation. Socio-cultural scholars investigating sport-related pain and injury, however, have called into question this suggested relationship pointing especially to competitive and contact sports as examples that challenge this assumption (Theberge, 2008 Theberge, N. 2008. “Just a normal bad part of what I do”: Elite athletes’ accounts of the relationship between health and sport. Sociology of Sport Journal, 25: 206–222. [Crossref], [Web of Science ®] , [Google Scholar]. “Just a normal bad part of what I do”: Elite athletes’ accounts of the relationship between health and sport. Sociology of Sport Journal, 25, 206–222; Waddington, 2004 Waddington, I. 2004. “Sport, health, and public policy”. In Sporting bodies, damaged selves: Sociological studies in sports-related injury, Edited by: Young, K. London: Elsevier. [Google Scholar]. Sport, health, and public policy. In K. Young (Ed.), Sporting bodies, damaged selves: Sociological studies in sports-related injury. London: Elsevier; Young, 2004 Young, K. 2004. “Sports-related pain and injury: Sociological notes”. In Sporting bodies, damaged selves: Sociological studies of sports-related injury, Edited by: Young, K. 1–25. Oxford: Elsevier. [Crossref] , [Google Scholar]. Sports-related pain and injury: Sociological notes. In K.Young (Ed.), Sporting bodies, damaged selves: Sociological studies of sports-related injury (pp. 1–25). Oxford: Elsevier). In this paper, I use autobiographical and interview materials to explore how people who participate in Ironman triathlons construct health; I reveal the ways that in this non-contact, non-professional sport, ideas that connect health to body image and functionality, emerged most frequently in my analysis. I suggest that these constructions are influenced by neoliberal health discourses, in particular, the notions of individual responsibility, the use of leisure (non-work) time for self-work and (albeit to an extreme end) anti-obesity messages. Insights in this paper serve to further challenge popular assumptions that participation in sport is unquestionably healthy even in non-competitive, individual sport scenarios.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.085

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0160.043
Scholarly communication0.0070.005
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.075
GPT teacher head0.335
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLeisure/LoisirSame topicSport and Mega-Event ImpactsFrench-language works237,207