MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108200561 · doi:10.1109/tap.2011.2143686

Stability Analysis and Improvement of the Conformal ADI-FDTD Methods

2011· article· en· W2108200561 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConformal mapFinite-difference time-domain methodStability (learning theory)MathematicsFinite difference methodMathematical analysisAlternating direction implicit methodApplied mathematicsComputer scienceOpticsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In order to model curved conducting boundaries with high accuracy, conformal alternating direction implicit finite-difference time-domain (ADI-FDTD) methods have been developed with applications of Dey-Mittra's and Yu-Mittra's conformal techniques. We show that the conformal ADI-FDTD methods developed as such lose the unconditional stability although it is expected with the ADI schemes. We present the theoretical analysis and numerical experiments that proves our findings. We then present a modified conformal ADI-FDTD technique with better stability than those based on Yu-Mittra's and Dey-Mittra's conformal techniques.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.747
Threshold uncertainty score0.227

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it