MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108200628 · doi:10.1017/s1352465810000196

Verbal Repetition in the Reappraisal of Contamination-Related Thoughts

2010· article· en· W2108200628 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueBehavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPsychologyVigilance (psychology)DistressCognitive reappraisalCognitionExpressive SuppressionCognitive psychologyThought suppressionClinical psychologyDevelopmental psychologyAudiologyPsychiatryMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Acceptance and Commitment Therapy advocates use of cognitive defusion techniques to reduce the distress evoked by negative thoughts, including verbal repetition (VR). In VR, a negative word is repeated until its semantic meaning is diluted (i.e. until semantic satiation is achieved). The present two studies examined whether VR is more effective than brief imaginal exposure (IE) and no intervention (CONT) in the reappraisal of contamination-related thoughts. METHOD: Participants high in contamination fears identified their most distressing thoughts and were randomly assigned to VR, IE, or CONT. A category membership decision task was also conducted to determine if VR produced semantic satiation. RESULTS: In Study 1, there was no evidence of semantic satiation. Significant reductions in negative response to the thoughts was observed immediately following VR, but not IE or CONT; however, at one-week follow-up, both VR and IE groups reported similar reductions. In Study 2, the effects of VR and IE practice between post-intervention and follow-up were examined, as well as changes in behavioural avoidance. VR was found to produce semantic satiation of contamination thoughts, and VR was associated with less negative response at follow-up relative to IE and CONT, but the degree of satiation was not associated with the decreases in negative response. Only IE produced decreases in behavioural avoidance and vigilance monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, these results suggest that VR may have potential as an additional strategy for managing obsessional thoughts, but more research is warranted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.370
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.351
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it