MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Deposition Properties of Fine Sediment

2003· article· en· W2108218152 on OpenAlex
Katy Haralampides, J. Alex McCorquodale, Bommanna G. Krishnappan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Hydraulic Engineering · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
FundersUniversity of Windsor
KeywordsFlumeDeposition (geology)SettlingShear stressGeotechnical engineeringGeologySedimentShear (geology)GeomorphologyEnvironmental scienceMaterials scienceMechanicsFlow (mathematics)Composite materialPetrologyEnvironmental engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes depositional properties of the fine portion (D<0.075mm) of the surficial bed sediments taken from the Upper St. Clair River. The experiments were conducted using the circular flume facility at the Canada Center for Inland Waters in Burlington, Canada. Tests were conducted under the same initial conditions, which involved mechanical mixing following the application of a very high shear stress that resulted in a solids suspension of 200 g/L. Deposition was allowed to occur under five different shear stresses. The deposition rate and the floc size were monitored using a laser based Malvern particle size analyzer. The results were used to estimate the settling velocity as a function of applied shear stress and lapsed time for the selected shear stress.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.404
Threshold uncertainty score0.305

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.178
Teacher spread0.171 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it