MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2108232664 · doi:10.1134/s0032945212100050

Grenadier abundance examined at varying spatial scales in deep waters off Newfoundland, Canada, with special focus on the influence of corals

2012· article· en· W2108232664 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Ichthyology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicCoral and Marine Ecosystems Studies
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans CanadaNewfoundland and Labrador Centre for Applied Health ResearchMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersFisheries and Oceans CanadaNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsTransectAbundance (ecology)GorgonianCoralEcologyBiologyBelt transectRelative species abundanceHabitatBiodiversityFishery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is a growing body of research examining the effects of corals on fish communities, species abundances, and biodiversity. Yet, few studies have quantitatively examined what factors are influencing the distribution of individual fish species. In general, many researchers believe they know what influences the distribution of grenadiers on large spatial scales, but numerous studies have shown the distributions of organisms are often determined by various factors that change in relative importance when viewed at differing scales. Our study used video collected from three deep canyons off Newfoundland, Canada (North west Atlantic) to examine how the factors apparently influencing the distribution of four grenadiers (Macrouridae: Coryphaenoides rupestris, Coryphaenoides carapinus, Nezumia bairdii , and Macrourus berglax ) change when assessed at varying spatial scales. We paid special attention to the influence of deep-water corals found in the study area (large gorgonians/antipatharians, small gorgonians, sea pens, soft corals, and cup corals). The factors that influenced grenadier presence and/or abundance (and the magnitude of this effect) varied as different sampling resolutions were examined. We found C. rupestris abundance was positively related to cup coral abundance in transects longer than 10 m, likely as a result of similar habitat preferences between both taxa. When significant relationships between depth and C. rupestris presence and/or abundance were found, they were always negative. Depth was a significant predictor of C. carapinus abundance in transects longer than 10 m. Very few predictors of M. berglax abundance or presence could be found. Depth and the number of small gorgonians were consistent predictors of N. bairdii abundance.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.740
Threshold uncertainty score0.821

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.190
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it